Many, including experts and sexperts, have been baffled for eternity when it comes to one of the greatest questions of all time; What came first? The egg or the chicken?
Arguments and counter-arguments proposed by all and sundry and mondry have led to.. zilch. kapata. nothing.
And yet there is the humble numble me. Humble in disguise, numble in... well there is no such word. Not any that I am aware of anyway.
Now, where was I? Oh yes, then there is me... and me with the magic dragon.
Z (not me) : "Yaar King Kong mein bhagwaan ka kya role thaa??" x5
Just felt like recapping that bit of memorable memory. So about King-Kong.. I mean the chicken and the egg, Dastiism has shown me the way. Hours and days and weeks of procrastination.. uh I mean powerful, profound, depthful meditation has shown me the way to the secret of the universe. I (dot) E (dot) . EYE (dot) EEE (dot). AIY (dot) IYY (dot). The chicken came first obviously.
It's just something you have to think about before answering it, unlike most other things. It's a matter of Mind over Matter or even Matter over Mind, which ever way you want to think about it. Doesn't matter whether it's the chicken on top with the brain (mind) or the egg at the bottom... never "mind".
The main 'trick' to the solution of this problem is that, if the egg were to precede the hen, t'Hen' who the hell would engulf the egg in their feathery ass. No! The dinoaurs do not like the idea and nor do I.
The idea about feathers on asses that is, not sitting on eggs.
Now, if the hen were to land itself on earth first, we'd already have a feathery ass AS WELL AS the source of the egg. AHA! (or atleast half the source).
Now the question is, what caused the first egg to be born? A simple philosophical question about cause and effect. Think about it in whichever philosophic atmosphere that makes your brain cells most active, in the cold winds of the classical school of thought or the warm light of the romantic. Was it a rooster or was it the same phenomenon that caused Mary to give birth to Jesus. The Rooster seems to be the appropriate pick for the roster and this where I would like to stop thinking about cause and effect. And this is why I am not a big fan of philosophy.
Z (not me) : "Yaar King Kong mein bhagwaan ka kya role thaa??" x5
Aaah yes. That's better.
And what of Darwin's Evolution? That we were a bunch of monkeys before we ended up as what we are. Then what are we to become a million years from now? And the fact that there are still a bunch of them monkeys that did not change at all suggests that monkey's are stupid. Hence, no room for progress, or regress. Theory flawed.
Also, monkeys evolved and bananas didn't? Yaar waqai mein King Kong mein bhagwaan ka kya hi role ho ga. AYE (dot) EII (dot) Ha Ha (exclamation mark).
2 comments:
mera naam hi kaafi hai
you have seen the light.. i am proud.
Post a Comment